This What Works Brief is part of a continuing series of short, easy-to-read, “how to” information packets on a variety of evidence-based practices, strategies, and intervention procedures. This particular Brief is designed in a Question-and-Answer format, with a focus on administrators.
The inclusion of young children with special needs with their typically developing peers has been the subject of discussion for more than three
decades. There are several compelling reasons to create high-quality inclusive programs for young children with special needs. First, federal
law supports inclusion. Second, research has shown teachers’ ability and success in modifying activities and contexts in such a way that they
facilitate the development of young children with special needs. Third, inclusive settings are necessary to implement a number of effective
intervention practices, such as social skills training where typically developing peers support the development of social competence by children
with special needs. Finally, inclusive settings enhance children’s generalization of skills and support the development of positive attitudes by
typically developing children. The burden is not on children with special needs to “get ready” to benefit from inclusive child care or Head Start
settings. Rather, early childhood settings need to be ready to modify staffing, curriculum, and teaching practices for children whose range and
depth of need may exceed that of many other youngsters.
Research indicates that state and local administrators and other program leaders play a pivotal role in making inclusion work. In addition to
complying with state and federal requirements, child care and Head Start administrators and program leaders in other early childhood
environments set the tone and philosophy of a program. The tone with which administrators approach inclusion affects how personnel and
families feel about inclusion as well as the capacity of the personnel to be successful in including children with disabilities. Following are
some frequently asked questions about challenges that administrators of early care programs face and some strategies for addressing those
challenges. The challenges and the strategies presented below have been gathered from program personnel, researchers, and family members
from across the country.
Three important federal disability laws related to early care and education of young children with disabilities promote inclusion to the fullest extent and protect the civil rights of individuals with disabilities:
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), a federal civil rights law that went into effect in 1992, states that people with disabilities are entitled to equal rights in employment, state and local public services, and public accommodations, such as schools and early childhood programs, including child care centers, Head Start programs, and family child care homes.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, enacted in 1973, prohibits discrimination against children and adults on the basis of a disability by any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Included under this Act is any public or private preschool, child care center, Head Start/Early Head Start, or family child care home that receives federal funds either directly or through a grant, loan, or contract.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), originally enacted in 1975 (as the Education for All Handicapped Act, or EHA), ensures all children and youth with disabilities access to a free, appropriate public education. The 1997 revisions to the Act strengthened early childhood services under IDEA. Several major provisions apply to young children:
For ADA and Section 504, it is important to assess the program’s accessibility, policies, activities, and materials. Administrators can develop action plans that use the following strategies:
For IDEA requirements, make sure that the activities and strategies of the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) for infants and their families and the Individualized Education Program (IEP) written plan for older children are being followed. Also, if you think that a child in your care may have a disability or special need, you should talk with the family and provide them with contact information for your local school district for an IDEA evaluation. If the child is under 3 years of age, the child’s health care provider may make the referral for evaluation, or the parent can contact the local school district or state early intervention program under IDEA.
Young children with disabilities and their families who are eligible for programs under IDEA have a right to services to meet their individual needs. Depending on the child’s age, and a state’s procedures, either the early intervention program or the local school district should respond to the parent’s or your referral. If the child is found eligible for IDEA services, an individualized plan will be developed with the child’s parents and others to determine what services will be provided and where they will be delivered.
Frequent and open communication and strong partnerships with the child’s family are paramount to working effectively with families. Listen to parents to find out what concerns family members may have about their child’s development as well as what the child is able to do in the home setting. Make sure that they understand the concerns you have about their child’s development as well as the child’s strengths.
As a person who spends time with the child, a child care provider or early childhood educator is in an ideal position to assist the child and family in developing plans and instructional approaches to achieve those goals. Your involvement in this process is very important!
Researchers have reported that early childhood professionals and parents describe similar challenges to inclusion whether they are involved with child care, school districts, or Head Start:
Although all of these concerns and challenges are very real, they can and have been addressed effectively by administrators in many communities.
First, administrators from child care, Head Start, school districts, and other early care and education settings can work to develop a vision and belief that inclusion is important and can be successful in their communities. Administrators can develop this vision by accessing research findings about the importance of inclusion and by talking with those who have accomplished successful inclusion efforts.
Second, community planning teams composed of school districts, child care, Head Start, families, and others can be formed to plan how to make inclusion work and to develop cooperative agreements for sharing information and resources and for contracting or arranging for consulting services and shared training. Programs can share trained and certified personnel by cost sharing or by providing itinerate services to each other. These certified personnel can provide technical assistance, support, and supervision to program staff who are in day-to-day contact with children and families.
Third, administrators can recognize that beliefs and attitudes are critical to the success of inclusion. By arranging meetings with staff and families, administrators can (1) set a tone of trust and assure that peoples’ fears and concerns are valid, (2) provide information about the importance of inclusion, (3) clarify laws supporting inclusion, (4) offer a format for brainstorming strategies for overcoming challenges, and (5) provide opportunities for staff and families to hear from programs that have successfully implemented inclusion. As staff receive training and technical assistance, early childhood providers will experience success and feel supported and more positive about their skills and knowledge in serving children with disabilities.
Administrators can try a number of different strategies to help them facilitate their programs’ inclusion efforts:
For those wishing to learn more about the topic, the following resources provide additional information:
This What Works Brief was developed by the Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning. Contributors to this Brief were B. J. Smith, P. Strain, and M. M. Ostrosky.
September 2004
We welcome your feedback on this What Works Brief. Please go to the CSEFEL Web site (http://csefel.uiuc.edu) or call us at (217) 333-4123 to offer suggestions.
About Us | Contact Us | Resources | Chat | Primary Partners & CCTAN | Site Map | Search | Home